If Islam were a Violent Religion Then All Muslims Would Be Violent

The Truth:

This argument presumes that it is valid to make assumptions about an ideology based on the behavior of adherents. However, if this were the case, then we would have to conclude that Islam is different and dangerous. True, most Muslims are not terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslim. If Islam is a religion of peace, why is it the only one that consistently produces religiously-motivated terrorist attacks each and every day of the year?

Rather than answer a question with a question, let’s just say that the reason most Muslims don’t kill is that, regardless of what Islam may or may not teach, it’s wrong to kill over religion. Most people know deep down that if God wanted people dead for not believing in Him, then He’s perfectly capable of doing the job Himself.

Here’s a similar question with identical logic to the “If the Quran taught violence then all Muslims would be violent” argument:

“If the Quran taught that a thief’s hand should be cut off, then all Muslims would cut off hands.”

We can all agree that very few Muslims cut off hands and that a majority (perhaps) believe it is wrong to do so. If the logic were sound, then this would be proof that the Quran does not say to cut off hands.

But the Quran does say this… quite clearly, in fact:

Cut off the hand of the thief, male or female, as a recompense for that which they committed, a punishment by way of example from Allah. Quran 5:38

This is also the example set by Muhammad according to the Hadith (Bukhari 81:792). Yet, the vast majority of Muslims do not do this.

What this means is that proof of what Islam teaches or what the Quran says is not necessarily found in what the majority of Muslims choose to do or not do.

As individuals, Muslims make their own choices about which parts of their religion they practice and which parts they would rather dismiss via the guise of “context”.

Adherents may think or say whatever they want to about Islam, it doesn’t change what Islam says about itself. As a documented ideology, Islam exists independently of anyone’s opinion. As such, it may be studied objectively, apart from how anyone practices or chooses to interpret it.

The Quran plainly teaches that it is not only proper to kill in the name of Allah in certain circumstances, but that it is required. Muslims who don’t believe in killing over religion either do not know of Muhammad’s example or tacitly prefer a moral law that is independent of it. Those who put Islam first or know Islam best will think and act differently, even if they are in the minority.

Few Muslims have ever read the Quran to any extent, much less pursued an honest investigation of the actual words and deeds of Muhammad (which were more in line with hedonism, deception, power and violence than moral restraint). The harsh rules that Muslim countries impose on free speech to protect Islam from examination also prevent it from being fully understood.

As Taslima Nasreen succinctly puts it, “Islam is a violent ideology. Most Muslims are not violent – because they believe Islam is not violent.”

In the West, many Muslims, devout or otherwise, simply prefer to believe that Islam is aligned with the Judeo-Christian principles of peace and tolerance, even if it requires filtering evidence to the contrary. They read into the Quran what they want to see.

But, while most Muslims are peaceful in spite of Islam, others are dangerous because of it. It is what some of us comfortably refer to as “radicalization” – an ‘affliction’ that is conspicuously endemic to Islam.

Purists who take Islam to heart are more likely to become terrorists than humanitarians. Those most prone to abandoning themselves to Muhammad’s message without a moral filter are always the more dangerous and supremacist minded. They may be called ‘extremists’ or ‘fundamentalists,’ but, at the end of the day, they are dedicated to the Quran and the path of Jihad as mandated by Muhammad.

This explains why Islam is a constant challange that becomes harder to deal with as the number of Muslims increases.

Islam should not have an impact on our society:

Monday, May 14, 2018

support for mosques must be stopped!

As a society, we shoot ourselves in the foot if we give the same privileges to Islam that we give to the Folk Church, “says Pernille Vermund, leader of New Citizens.

Mosques should not be treated equally with the people church. State support for mosques must be stopped, says Pernille Vermund, leader of the party New Citizens in Denmark.

Politicians are naive in their misunderstood tolerance to Islam. The ideology of Islam stands for all the opposite of Western values, democracy and equality. Therefore, Islam must have no influence on our society, “says Pernille Vermund. Vermund elaborates on a debate post she has and another New Citizen candidate, Poul Højlund, had in the newspaper JyskeVestkysten Monday. (The article is not online)

Here in the country one must believe and think as you please. That’s how it should be. The state must not interfere. Therefore, we must not forbid Muslims to believe. Faith is a private matter. But Islam must have no influence on society. Muslims’ religion must remain private, “they write in the article.

«In three specific areas, the state supports Islam and involves Islam in society. Muslims who pay to the Sharia mosques can withdraw the amount from tax. Imams can, on behalf of the state, make two Muslims legal formally married people. And Sharia preachers from abroad receive a residence permit under special conditions. ”

“As a community, we shoot ourselves in the foot by giving the same privileges to Islam as we give to the People’s Church. Islam is both a religion and an ideology. Islam is both faith and politics. It can not be separated. You might think that our politicians had gradually realized that Islam is a danger to democratic societies. Islam must not be recognized but forced back, “writes Vermund and Højlund.

Outer left and Islam united – in Shoaib Sultan

Outer-Left Representative Shoaib Sultan writes inaccuracies on the state-sponsored blog of the (Anti) racist center. “Desired error from the outside right,” is the headline. It is HRS, and especially the online newspaper Resett, which will be reviewed. “Is it not possible that the country’s (England) laws should apply to right-wing activists just like everyone else?” Asks Sultan in the blog post.

Shoaib Sultan was former Secretary General of Islamic Council Norway. Now he has given his full support to the left side.

Sultan: “The rules for protecting the integrity of legal process must be considered as part of British legal culture, and it is strange to see such a small understanding of these in everyone who supposedly should be so keen on British and European culture.” Why is this opportunity used? , Sultan?

Answer: In order to protect followers of Islam, since it had been rioting about the truth, if it was lubricated daily. The up to 30 “monsters”, the vast majority of those with Muslim affection, who rage in bestial terms, often many to little children, and for their own perverse pleasure, since the Prophet (peace be upon his name) does not condemn abuse of unbelief . Yes, read the Qur’an, Sultan. Or strongly encourage shortening it to spiritual content.

Ok, Sultan. Here you are a little like the Norwegian truth site Faktisk.no. (Is there still a group rape if there were only 5 who raped you and not 20?) To get the most important first: There have been group rapes where the perpetrators are Muslims in Norway. Did you not know? Do not you read HRS? And let us, for the sake of discussion, assume that what has happened has not happened. Had the slight slip (which is not a miss) had a lot to say when it took place in England, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden?

We are in Sweden only to spread Islam

Swedish Muslim leader: “We are in Sweden only to spread Islam”

On May 3rd, a Muslim leader named Dominic Driman held a lecture for young Muslims in Klippan, Sweden. The lecture was filmed and the message could not have been more clear: Muslims in Sweden have a mission and it is to make Sweden Muslim.

According to Driman, the spread of Islam is the only reason why human beings exist. The call for the young Muslims in Klippan was ready. They have to organize themselves so that they can first make Klippan Muslim, so the rest of Sweden.

Driman encourages young people to organize themselves, and they simply need to be circumvented with other “rioters”. Driman is himself a convert.

– Then surround yourself with people who cultivate him and spread his religion. Work together and organize. Everybody should have a task, everyone should have a function. It must not take 20 years before Sweden is a Muslim country. I’m not kidding, Sweden will be a Muslim country, “he says.

Driman tells the young people that the Muslims once had the largest empire on earth, which stretches from today’s China to today’s Spain.

The young Muslims in Klippan receive contributions from the municipality, and so are other places in Sweden. Lectures and sermons where it is encouraged to Islamize the country is financed by taxpayers.

Did Mohammed write the Quran

It is factual mistake that Mohammed wrote the Quran. Shortly after Muhammad’s death, the Quran was gathered by his companions who wrote down and memorized parts of it. These notes had differences that motivated Kalif Uthman ibn Affan to establish a standard version now known as Uthman’s codex, which is generally regarded as the original of the Qur’an known today. This is known knowledge among Islamic scholars and professors at various universities.

Muslim scholars believe that Muhammad was the illiterate, as mentioned in the Qur’an itself: “Those who follow the Messenger, the Prophet, who can neither read nor write, as they will find described in the Torah and the Gospel (as is) with them …… “Quran 7: 157.

Some researchers, such as John Wansbrough, Michael Cook and Patricia Crone, have not been willing to award the entire Quran to Muhammad (or Uthman) and claim that “there is no evidence of the existence of the Quran in any form before the last decade of it 7th century. ”

What is at least correct is that the Quran was not recorded by Muhammad.

Islam and women

Seen in our democratic and inclusive society, it will look like this for us.

Aside from Islam, which was created in the 700’s, it is quite natural and look at the woman as an asset.
Because when you own something, you can decide on it and how this should be done to others.
If ownership had not come in, you did not have the same right of destination …. Or what?

Islam suppresses everything that has nothing to do with its faithfulness.
But it is entirely natural for a patriarchal management system to do something like that.
First ayatollaer imams then the man and his children, the woman finally saw.

The woman is a necessary part of the family’s increase, and she enjoys respect when she is in the right age and is pregnant. Therefore, she has many children because she is measured by productivity. If she gets many girls and no boys, she is unsuccessful as a product.

Islam leads to terrorism

Of course, Islam and terror coincide. Just consider the following conditions: The terrorists themselves are deeply convinced of it. They use the Quran and references to the Prophet Muhammad to justify his actions. They kill in Islam’s name.

Even though the terrorists would be wrong in their interpretation of Islam, it is Islam that motivates them. However, if we point to Islam alone as the greatest threat to our security, we will probably increase the likelihood of terror – albeit marginally.

1 2 3