Some truths about Islam

Sunday 15 july 2018

Islam is the ideology of evil. Being a slave of the moon god and submitting to his regulation is Satan’s bright side. He was the light angel in heaven before he was thrown out. Today, he blends many with his false light.

Islam is an instrument for bringing the world into a darkness that no one has ever seen before. I fight Islam with prayer and Muslims are saved in many Muslim countries. Christians throughout the world pray for salvation for Muslims.

The battle between Sunni and Shia is proof of Satan’s wrath against those who interpret Islam wrong. Other Muslims such as Ahmadiyya are banned by Shia and Sunni. So Islam is a hedonistic belief with many ideological principles that will make it impossible to lead Islam to world domination.

Gay love is a sin

Tuesday, July 10, 2018

The church must make a settlement with gay hatred in Christian communities
Faith can move mountains, but who moves the faith?

If the church believes serious about being a church for all, it must make a settlement against the gay hatred that characterizes many Christian communities. It does not help her hands and lean back on her own marriage decision.

Fortunately, the Church has come up with better thoughts than preaching death and eternal spoilage over people who love some of the same sex. Unfortunately, there are plenty of dark powers that behind closed prayer doors condemn gay practice, paralyzed marriage and believe that the family is reserved for heterosexual couples. In order to fight this, we have to take the debate on Christianity’s own premises. The church must make a settlement with the homophathy in many Christian communities.

We have all read from them: Good adults, Christian, white men, happy to live in a charming little village along the coast in southwestern Norway or in northern Norway. They share in common that they are strongly engaged in or lead a reactionary Christian environment. In the newspaper slots and the church magazines they call out the wrath of God and a good dose of oldest condemnation of people who will “destroy the foundation of society: the family.”

In the comments fields are the pitiful provocators, but in their environments they are the king on the hill. Both places push the Bible and the word of God in front of them.

Their starting point is always the same: We can read in your book of Moses and Paul’s words about all possible suffering and misery that will hit those who dare to defy the Bible’s prohibition of homosexual intercourse. By virtue of the Bible, they spread their message, but they rarely encounter theological contamination. It’s no use so all world celebrities, politicians, commentators and bloggers had taken a total distance from the statements. Doomsday preachers and celebrities speak neither in the same language nor to the same audience.

I’ve seen the consequences. Young and old who are driven to the edge of the dungeon to grasp Christianity and “one true faith.” Women and men who live a life of eternal denial or a double life next to spouse and children. For some of them the pressure is too big. Some end their relationship with the church, while others end life. Where are the moral philosophers of the Christian Movement then? Where are those who speak of charity, mercy and mercy? Where are the critical voices that ask “We went too far”?

For too many years, the church has despised and denied the overthrows of gay and sexual minorities as a global Christian world order has been committed for centuries. Things are on the way, but the majority of the world’s churches have not seen the light. Not everyone here on earth.

Why does not the church and the Christian people make a final settlement with this kind of theological thinking? Where are the church’s employees, bishops and priests? Where are the Christian editors in our country and the day, or are the birds of prey? All we hear is the deafening silence.

On a case-by-case basis, discrimination against gay and sexual minorities remains unprecedented. The examples are many: In the Salvation Army, gays are excluded from participating in church work and faith. Normally, employees risk losing their jobs because of their partner, while the MorFarBarn organization is leading the attack on gay parents and homosexual marriage together with 36 other organizations and churches.

Faith can move mountains, but who moves the faith? The Bible and the understanding of it have always been interpreted into the time we live in. Also in the church there are voices that make a blow for a more human view of skeptic love. It’s all reason to shout. Yet they are so little and apparently they have to fight the fight in their own rows.

With its silence, the church and the Christian people communicate an attitude to attitudes and theological thinking that has a hateful and, at best, discriminatory character. One can quickly get the impression that Kristen Norway believes that God’s love and mercy are just as great that it fits into the bedroom to discriminate against you and the partner you have chosen. If that is not the case, they should make a settlement with the homohate on Christianity’s own premises.


My comment about it is:

Everyone must understand that homosexuality is a sin in the Bible. It is not for discussion sometime. The Norwegian Church has become political and no longer follows the Bible. I’ve signed off a long time ago. Many free churches in Norway follow the Bible better and have taken a stand on this question. I feel that time has come to choose side, and I choose the Bible in this. Homosexuality is a sin and will always be. But everyone has forgotten that God hates sin but loves the sinner. Therefore, we are equal to God. But practicing gay is to fall off that priviledge.

If Islam were a Violent Religion Then All Muslims Would Be Violent

The Truth:

This argument presumes that it is valid to make assumptions about an ideology based on the behavior of adherents. However, if this were the case, then we would have to conclude that Islam is different and dangerous. True, most Muslims are not terrorists, but most terrorists are Muslim. If Islam is a religion of peace, why is it the only one that consistently produces religiously-motivated terrorist attacks each and every day of the year?

Rather than answer a question with a question, let’s just say that the reason most Muslims don’t kill is that, regardless of what Islam may or may not teach, it’s wrong to kill over religion. Most people know deep down that if God wanted people dead for not believing in Him, then He’s perfectly capable of doing the job Himself.

Here’s a similar question with identical logic to the “If the Quran taught violence then all Muslims would be violent” argument:

“If the Quran taught that a thief’s hand should be cut off, then all Muslims would cut off hands.”

We can all agree that very few Muslims cut off hands and that a majority (perhaps) believe it is wrong to do so. If the logic were sound, then this would be proof that the Quran does not say to cut off hands.

But the Quran does say this… quite clearly, in fact:

Cut off the hand of the thief, male or female, as a recompense for that which they committed, a punishment by way of example from Allah. Quran 5:38

This is also the example set by Muhammad according to the Hadith (Bukhari 81:792). Yet, the vast majority of Muslims do not do this.

What this means is that proof of what Islam teaches or what the Quran says is not necessarily found in what the majority of Muslims choose to do or not do.

As individuals, Muslims make their own choices about which parts of their religion they practice and which parts they would rather dismiss via the guise of “context”.

Adherents may think or say whatever they want to about Islam, it doesn’t change what Islam says about itself. As a documented ideology, Islam exists independently of anyone’s opinion. As such, it may be studied objectively, apart from how anyone practices or chooses to interpret it.

The Quran plainly teaches that it is not only proper to kill in the name of Allah in certain circumstances, but that it is required. Muslims who don’t believe in killing over religion either do not know of Muhammad’s example or tacitly prefer a moral law that is independent of it. Those who put Islam first or know Islam best will think and act differently, even if they are in the minority.

Few Muslims have ever read the Quran to any extent, much less pursued an honest investigation of the actual words and deeds of Muhammad (which were more in line with hedonism, deception, power and violence than moral restraint). The harsh rules that Muslim countries impose on free speech to protect Islam from examination also prevent it from being fully understood.

As Taslima Nasreen succinctly puts it, “Islam is a violent ideology. Most Muslims are not violent – because they believe Islam is not violent.”

In the West, many Muslims, devout or otherwise, simply prefer to believe that Islam is aligned with the Judeo-Christian principles of peace and tolerance, even if it requires filtering evidence to the contrary. They read into the Quran what they want to see.

But, while most Muslims are peaceful in spite of Islam, others are dangerous because of it. It is what some of us comfortably refer to as “radicalization” – an ‘affliction’ that is conspicuously endemic to Islam.

Purists who take Islam to heart are more likely to become terrorists than humanitarians. Those most prone to abandoning themselves to Muhammad’s message without a moral filter are always the more dangerous and supremacist minded. They may be called ‘extremists’ or ‘fundamentalists,’ but, at the end of the day, they are dedicated to the Quran and the path of Jihad as mandated by Muhammad.

This explains why Islam is a constant challange that becomes harder to deal with as the number of Muslims increases.

Islam should not have an impact on our society:

Monday, May 14, 2018

support for mosques must be stopped!

As a society, we shoot ourselves in the foot if we give the same privileges to Islam that we give to the Folk Church, “says Pernille Vermund, leader of New Citizens.

Mosques should not be treated equally with the people church. State support for mosques must be stopped, says Pernille Vermund, leader of the party New Citizens in Denmark.

Politicians are naive in their misunderstood tolerance to Islam. The ideology of Islam stands for all the opposite of Western values, democracy and equality. Therefore, Islam must have no influence on our society, “says Pernille Vermund. Vermund elaborates on a debate post she has and another New Citizen candidate, Poul Højlund, had in the newspaper JyskeVestkysten Monday. (The article is not online)

Here in the country one must believe and think as you please. That’s how it should be. The state must not interfere. Therefore, we must not forbid Muslims to believe. Faith is a private matter. But Islam must have no influence on society. Muslims’ religion must remain private, “they write in the article.

«In three specific areas, the state supports Islam and involves Islam in society. Muslims who pay to the Sharia mosques can withdraw the amount from tax. Imams can, on behalf of the state, make two Muslims legal formally married people. And Sharia preachers from abroad receive a residence permit under special conditions. ”

“As a community, we shoot ourselves in the foot by giving the same privileges to Islam as we give to the People’s Church. Islam is both a religion and an ideology. Islam is both faith and politics. It can not be separated. You might think that our politicians had gradually realized that Islam is a danger to democratic societies. Islam must not be recognized but forced back, “writes Vermund and Højlund.

Religion damages society, the chronicle of atheist Håvard Pedersen

Why should we tolerate women’s oppression, discrimination and alternative facts as long as it is disguised as religion?

The leader of the Christian People’s Party, Knut Arild Hareide, is concerned. He is worried about the newly expanded government’s value creation, and calls the new government platform for “extreme secular”. Contrary to Hareide, I think religion has no place in politics, or society in general.

“If you think I’m going to burn in hell, I think you should be opposed.”

At the beginning of the 2000s a movement called nyateism occurred. The movement is based on an idea that religion should not be tolerated, but instead, it is combated and criticized with rational arguments. Not through attacks on religious people, but on religion itself and the content of it. The term is often used as a clue of atheists who are perceived as excessive missionaries, or too offensive to the beliefs of others. It is also what separates them from other atheists.

I even identify myself as a newcomer. I sincerely mean that religion as a concept is harmful to society. Here you will hear why:

Most religions proclaim that unbelief should be sent to hell on the day of judgment. With such an active condemnation, I have difficulty seeing how to claim self-exempt from condemnation. If you think I’m going to burn in hell, I think you should be opposed. Your children get what you think about me and my children get what you think about me. Such attitudes are not healthy.

“I sincerely mean that religion as a concept is harmful to society.”

People’s need for group affiliation is not a mechanism to shake off. This is what forms nations, holds soccer teams all over the world, gives us identity policies and keeps the technology war between iPhone and Android trailers. Religion plays the same strings to give the feeling that those who belong to religion are the ones chosen, while the rest are outsiders. This is a direct obstacle to humanity being able to work effectively together. For how can you feel fellowship with others when your god tells you that they are less worthwhile?

Most people understand that a constructed and thousands of years old model of the world will be contradicted by science. It is not natural for religions. When they encounter resistance, they respond in the same way every time – with fighting.

“How can you feel fellowship with others when your God tells you that they are less worthwhile?”

One thing is how many scientists who have been hunted, imprisoned and in many cases killed because of their allegations. But how many potential scientists has the world missed because one has learned not to question God’s will? How many hundred years has science been held back in total? I am pretty sure that today there is still a large proportion of people who grow up in the belief that quantum mechanics, evolution and even elementary astronomy are trivial or just theories.

This component should strictly not require a thorough explanation. Still, books that say that all you need to do after raping a girl is considered to pay her father a handful of silver coins for saints.

“There is hardly a religion that does not say that women and men have different values.”

In humanity, the very essence is that every human being is responsible for his own actions. Religion teaches us the opposite: God has predetermined all that happens, evil actions are due in many cases to evil demons, and forgiveness is a matter between you and your god. Studies have been conducted showing that atheists are underrepresented in prisons. Think about the next time someone denies religious morality as high-value – there are more religious than non-religious in jail. .

Ethics and morals are in human nature. Therefore morality is largely common to all cultures of the world, even those who do not have religion as a common denominator. But basing their world’s understanding of fables obviously does something about your innate compass, compared to atheists.

Yes, it is a memento going on in most religions and you literally interpret fewer and fewer religious writings. But what does people do to read these evil attitudes in their holy books, even if they do not live by them? Is not it like saying that you think Jewish jokes are okay to push as long as you do not really stand for the message?

It affects us to have this inheritance in our society. That’s why I’m a New Yorkian. Because I want humanity to get the best possible conditions, and I’m pretty sure it does not have religion as a significant factor.

Outer left and Islam united – in Shoaib Sultan

Outer-Left Representative Shoaib Sultan writes inaccuracies on the state-sponsored blog of the (Anti) racist center. “Desired error from the outside right,” is the headline. It is HRS, and especially the online newspaper Resett, which will be reviewed. “Is it not possible that the country’s (England) laws should apply to right-wing activists just like everyone else?” Asks Sultan in the blog post.

Shoaib Sultan was former Secretary General of Islamic Council Norway. Now he has given his full support to the left side.

Sultan: “The rules for protecting the integrity of legal process must be considered as part of British legal culture, and it is strange to see such a small understanding of these in everyone who supposedly should be so keen on British and European culture.” Why is this opportunity used? , Sultan?

Answer: In order to protect followers of Islam, since it had been rioting about the truth, if it was lubricated daily. The up to 30 “monsters”, the vast majority of those with Muslim affection, who rage in bestial terms, often many to little children, and for their own perverse pleasure, since the Prophet (peace be upon his name) does not condemn abuse of unbelief . Yes, read the Qur’an, Sultan. Or strongly encourage shortening it to spiritual content.

Ok, Sultan. Here you are a little like the Norwegian truth site Faktisk.no. (Is there still a group rape if there were only 5 who raped you and not 20?) To get the most important first: There have been group rapes where the perpetrators are Muslims in Norway. Did you not know? Do not you read HRS? And let us, for the sake of discussion, assume that what has happened has not happened. Had the slight slip (which is not a miss) had a lot to say when it took place in England, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden?

Yes, I’m a good neighbor

Holidays. Of course, we will take into account each other on rest days when it comes to noisy work, but we can not let one single religion dictate the lives of all who do not follow it.

Leader in Bærum Velforbund, Erik Sennesvik, gives a message in Budstikka on Tuesday 29 May that we should pay attention to each other during this season and refrain from noisy work such as lawn mowing and similar work I do not have a lawnmower, so I must be the perfect neighbor.

I agree with Erik that we must take into account each other. I appreciate peace and quiet when I have a day off and are at home. Erik has a good and well-informed message in his post, but I want to offer a different perspective on holidays and the law of holiday peace.In terms of noise on holidays or holidays, I think we must be willing to give and take, be flexible and find good solutions.

Someone may need to do work that can be noisy and want to do this on their day off as they have the most time and opportunity to do it, but then it is Christianity that can make this difficult. There are robotic lawn mowers that do not make noise and this can be a good solution. As long as you do not do noisy work early in the day or late at night, it must be allowed. Of course, we should not disturb worship services with noise at their property, but work is done well, so it must be legal.

The problem with the law of holidays and public holidays is, however, that its origin is based on religion, here Christianity, and that it dictates the lives of all who do not follow it. I think we should abolish the concept of public holidays and holiday peace and that they are replaced by another solution that is better suited to our time and our population.

Norway does not only consist of Christians, but also consists of many humanists and atheists. You can only imagine the ramshack that could occur if Norway were to have public Islamic holidays, then one would soon see the value of the public’s religious neutrality.

We should abolish public holidays in Norway, and I press public because the public should not favor a single religion no matter how it has previously characterized Norway’s culture, history and traditions. Christianity is not a Norwegian religion, it is from the Middle East, and it should not dictate the lives of all of us who do not follow it.

I appreciate holidays, but I do not want Christianity to decide when I’m free or what I can not do on my day off. Christianity should not dictate business hours. Each business should be able to manage its operations regardless of religion and use the solutions that best suit them and their employees.

I propose not to reduce the number of days off, but some suggestions out there are replacing the holidays with an extra holiday week or a public holiday on the day of liberation on May 8th. We may still like to have free on Saturdays and Sundays, but then we call it rather rest days and change the name of the law to rest day.

Luckily, we do not have the same punishment for violating the day of rest as in the Bible. According to Leviticus 31:14, God demands death penalty for those who work on the day of rest and that they are to be cut off by their people. Looking at Leviticus 15: 32-36, God demands that a man gathering wood on the day of rest shall be laid to death.

We are in Sweden only to spread Islam

Swedish Muslim leader: “We are in Sweden only to spread Islam”

On May 3rd, a Muslim leader named Dominic Driman held a lecture for young Muslims in Klippan, Sweden. The lecture was filmed and the message could not have been more clear: Muslims in Sweden have a mission and it is to make Sweden Muslim.

According to Driman, the spread of Islam is the only reason why human beings exist. The call for the young Muslims in Klippan was ready. They have to organize themselves so that they can first make Klippan Muslim, so the rest of Sweden.

Driman encourages young people to organize themselves, and they simply need to be circumvented with other “rioters”. Driman is himself a convert.

– Then surround yourself with people who cultivate him and spread his religion. Work together and organize. Everybody should have a task, everyone should have a function. It must not take 20 years before Sweden is a Muslim country. I’m not kidding, Sweden will be a Muslim country, “he says.

Driman tells the young people that the Muslims once had the largest empire on earth, which stretches from today’s China to today’s Spain.

The young Muslims in Klippan receive contributions from the municipality, and so are other places in Sweden. Lectures and sermons where it is encouraged to Islamize the country is financed by taxpayers.

Did Mohammed write the Quran

It is factual mistake that Mohammed wrote the Quran. Shortly after Muhammad’s death, the Quran was gathered by his companions who wrote down and memorized parts of it. These notes had differences that motivated Kalif Uthman ibn Affan to establish a standard version now known as Uthman’s codex, which is generally regarded as the original of the Qur’an known today. This is known knowledge among Islamic scholars and professors at various universities.

Muslim scholars believe that Muhammad was the illiterate, as mentioned in the Qur’an itself: “Those who follow the Messenger, the Prophet, who can neither read nor write, as they will find described in the Torah and the Gospel (as is) with them …… “Quran 7: 157.

Some researchers, such as John Wansbrough, Michael Cook and Patricia Crone, have not been willing to award the entire Quran to Muhammad (or Uthman) and claim that “there is no evidence of the existence of the Quran in any form before the last decade of it 7th century. ”

What is at least correct is that the Quran was not recorded by Muhammad.

Islam and women

Seen in our democratic and inclusive society, it will look like this for us.

Aside from Islam, which was created in the 700’s, it is quite natural and look at the woman as an asset.
Because when you own something, you can decide on it and how this should be done to others.
If ownership had not come in, you did not have the same right of destination …. Or what?

Islam suppresses everything that has nothing to do with its faithfulness.
But it is entirely natural for a patriarchal management system to do something like that.
First ayatollaer imams then the man and his children, the woman finally saw.

The woman is a necessary part of the family’s increase, and she enjoys respect when she is in the right age and is pregnant. Therefore, she has many children because she is measured by productivity. If she gets many girls and no boys, she is unsuccessful as a product.

1 2