Swedish preschool ends with Lucia: – wrong with “gender perspective”

Sunday, November 25, 2018


Parents of children at a preschool in Motala in Sweden were announced during the previous week that the traditional lucia celebration at the preschool is now over. The reason for this is that preschool management does not want to “exclude someone”.

On Wednesday there was a debate during a meeting between parents and preschool teachers at Kärrbacken preschool in Motala, Östergötland, after the preschool had decided to terminate lucia celebration on a permanent basis. According to preschool leader Anna Karmskog, there are many reasons for the decision, and it should not have been relevant at any time to discuss the matter with the parents.

– There’s nothing they can decide. The decision is taken within the framework of the school act, against discrimination and offensive treatment. We do not want to exclude anyone, “says chairman Karmskog for local newspaper MVT.

During the meeting with the parents, Karmskog defended the decision that most children do not have high expectations for Lucia that not all parents can afford to buy clothes and equipment for the celebration and that children become troubled in large assemblies. In addition, it was stated that questions are asked about the “gender perspective” at Luciatoget, meaning it is problematic to distinguish between girls and boys in celebration.

The decision has created dissatisfaction among parents and children. Several of the parents left the meeting and resigned in the preschool council after the decision became known.

“We learned that it is not part of the curriculum, and that some children feel uneasy when it comes to standing in a group,” says Jessica Gunnige, one of the parents, to MVT.

My comments to this are:

The multiculture and trickery for Islam is everyday now. Our traditions are being excluded to adapt to Islam. Islam is Satan’s ideology and is a fauna we should forbid instead of accepting as a “good religion.” All Muslims in the West just wait for their chariots to come in the majority, so the demands of sharia and other sorcery come from Satan’s pantry.

I’m glad I’m too old to experience Satan’s imprint in our society, but our grandchildren will have big problems.

Economic consequences of a globalist policy

Sunday, November 25, 2018


There is a lot about economics in the Norwegian mainstream media, but you are not told an important indicator. Purchasing power adjusted GDP per capita shows how much in real value is produced for each Norwegian. You may be overwhelmed when I tell you that this is the same today as in 2007. If we include the fact that the richer part of the population has received a larger proportion of cakes in recent years, it means that the Norwegians have it worse now than ten years ago.

The mainstream media have mainly said that the Norwegian economy has gone well in recent years. This is true, but if we count on the huge increase in the population through immigration, we are experiencing the same badness today as ten years ago. We have had a lost decade.

Simple economic theory can indicate that immigration is the cause of the increasing skew distribution of resources. As in all transactions, the price is determined by supply and demand. When there are more jobs and not demand increases in line with this, the labor cost will be reduced. Particularly in the sectors where immigrants have the competence to work in or manage to acquire competence for, will experience increased competition and hence reduced wages.

It must be clarified when it comes to Norway that the market alone determines wages. Here, wages are set for each sector after negotiations between unions. Thus, the salary in Norway will not necessarily follow the market. In economic theory it is known that if wages are seen over what the market naturally determines (equilibrium), fewer positions will be offered.

In the last decade, the proportion of work has been drastically reduced. When the workers can not undermine each other, fewer people can get a job. Instead of adding two to a smaller salary, they must hire one for a higher salary. The increase in labor supply thus entails a reduction in the proportion of employment. What happens is that the weakest are selected out of work. It is clear that an employer wants preference for a healthy and experienced foreign worker, than a sick Norwegian worker. Outside is increasing as competition progresses.

Free trade is another fad for the globalist elite. They want the whole world to be able to trade without restrictions, something they say will bring a better economy. There is a truth in that we have access to cheaper products than ever, but a negative consequence is that domestic production is moved abroad. It is particularly uncertain whether cheaper products justify the major losses of jobs and resultant social degeneration. It follows from economic theory that free trade will lead to a convergence of wages between rich and poor countries. Because workers in richer countries will reduce their demands for work. The richest are those who will enjoy the best of this, since they can take more of the profits of production. There has been a huge increase in billionaires in the last 10 years and they are getting more and more of the world’s resources.

The globalist policy summarizes a reduction in standard of living for the poorest part of the population. It is a policy that transfers from the poor in the western world to the kingdom. If it is supposed to do this, I do not know, but the consequences are clear.